The median is central to many experimental data sets, and to calculate median in such examples is important, by not falling into the trap of reporting the arithmetic mean.
The median can be seen to be the “middle value” of the distribution, i.e. it separates the upper and lower halves.
To calculate median, consider the following example. Suppose we have the heights of different trees in a garden, and we need an “average” value for this. Say the heights in meters are 1.5, 6.9, 2.8, 1.8 and 2.3.
The median of this distribution is 2.3, which is the middle value, separating the lower half {1.5, 1.8} from the upper half {2.8, 6.9}.
Median = 2.3
Suppose there are six heights (New value: 1.2), rather than five:
1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.3, 2.8, 6.9
This leaves two middle values, {1.8, 2.3}. The median for this data set is (1.8+2.3)/2 = 2.05
Median = 2.05
One can immediately see that the data is skewed - the 6.9 meter tree makes it so. The arithmetic mean of this data is 3.08 meters, which is more than 4 out of 5 data points. Thus the arithmetic mean doesn’t make much sense in this case.
If the number of data points is even, unlike the example we previously considered, then to calculate median we simply take the mean of the middle two elements. Thus if we have 10 numbers arranged in ascending order, the median is the average of the 5th and 6th numbers.
If the salaries of professional passing out of college in thousands of dollars per annum is 60, 64, 71, 73, 73, 77, 82, 85, 160 and 255, then their median salary is (73+77)/2 = 75. The mean in this case is 100, which like the previous case, doesn’t make much sense and doesn’t really tell us about the central tendency of the data.
In cases where the data is skewed, it is the median that makes sense, and not the mean. In these cases, as an experimenter, you need to calculate median and not mean for your experiment. This is especially true in cases where there are outliers. Many scientists calculate their results both in terms of median and mean, to see whether the outcome of theirresults are the same.
The median is resistant to change with the discovery of outliers. For example, if we want to know the mean weight of all the dinosaurs, it is a very difficult task because we do not yet know all the types of dinosaurs that ever walked the earth. Therefore if a new type of dinosaur bigger than all the others is discovered, it will significantly alter the mean.
However, the median remains almost unchanged in this case. Thus in many cases when the end points of the data set are not known, you need to calculate median and not the mean for that data set.
Siddharth Kalla (Oct 25, 2009). Calculate Median. Retrieved Sep 28, 2020 from Explorable.com: https://forum.explorable.com/calculate-median
The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page.
That is it. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page. You can use it freely (with some kind of link), and we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations (with clear attribution).